I am trying to learn if this is something that would be generally frowned upon or something that may cause the opposite reaction. I seek opinions from everyone on whether this is a good idea, abuse of the system, or anything else. I understand the constitutional issues however feel to comment on them if you think that it is important.
This is a highly watered down version of everything, that is done to make the post as small as possible. There are a lot of details and fine points that are missing from this document as a result. Please don't critique what is provided over missing information or finer points of the law itself for that reason.
- BIA Registered natives can create "indian country", think of it like a reservation out of any land they own. I am one such registered native.
- Indian country only has 14 mandatory laws, the rest are from the tribal government (which would have none). Laws like murder, arson, rape, etc.
- Federal income and payroll tax is exempt if income is 1. from indian land 2. by a tribal member
- State sales tax is exempt if it is a sale to 1. the tribal government 2. on tribal land to tribal members (non-members have tax assessed and remitted to the state)
there is no blood quantum requirement to be a tribal member, the tribal government would decide who is a member, BIA has stated this
The base idea is to create a self sufficient community, no casinos just ranching, farming and other businesses as people see fit (restaurant, tavern, hair salon, whatever). Trade would be required for items like salt, toothpaste, toilet paper, etc but the model is designed to allow for surpluses in production to ensure that can happen. This is
not a commune, it is not a share all thing,
people own their own labor. Further it would be a community not a neighborhood, the difference is that largely you know your neighbors, you want to help them as opposed to have to help them, etc.
If there is a US collapse the states would be free to form their own union under the same or different rules as each State sees fit. As this would be legally equal to the states this nation would also be free to do the same, in essence it would be 100% sovereign at that time. If there is a US recovery then this nation would still be 99% sovereign and thus more free.
So would pulling land out of the state for something like this be generally frowned upon or not by the people on this forum?