AND while at the same time they were expanding the vote, they were watering down the representation by freezing the Reps to 435 AND by implementing the 17th amendment.
And guess what they froze the number at 435 in.......drum roll please.......
"March 4, 1913 435 Apportionment of the Thirteenth Census. House size locked by Public Law 62-5, excepting temporary expansions due to the admission of new states."
But alas...those founding fathers did say no LESS than one rep per 30,000...can you imagine the kind of REAL representation we'd have if there were 10,000 folks up there right now? Could you imagine the "power blocks" to come out of 10-15 "parties" from diverse BUT agreeing geographic regions? Check out...
http://thirty-thousand.org/ they think the number should be 30,000..."Thirty-thousand.org advocates the bill passed by the House in 1789: to require there be at least one Representative for every 50,000 people. At the current population level of approximately 300 million people, that formulation would require a minimum of 6,000 congressional districts."
Not only were they destroying the power of votes, they were making the number to be controlled/bought off more REASONABLE.
This is one more reason I am now a Bill of Rights American Individualist with an Anarchist-lean (because guess what, the Bill of Rights if EXERCISED protect themselves and they don't need to create a Ring of Power) versus a Constitutionalist.
MANUMIT